America’s justification for attacking Venezuela: Fact and fantasy in the drug wars

Source: Truth Social/Donald Trump
The US’s escalating actions against Venezuela reveal more about imperial power, criminal methods and strategic denial than any genuine concern about drugs or rule of law.
Australia – and all the other nation states on the planet – share a common status.
In terms of the rule of law – domestic and international – and mutual respect, we are irrelevant to whatever grand strategic purposes the United States is bent on achieving.
The strategy against Venezuela, which in plain terms involves serial murder on more than 80 counts on the high seas, internal destabilisation and the threat of invasion, is but the latest example of the antics of a rogue superpower.
To the extent that Australian governments (and others for that matter) remain silent, they debase themselves.
Their ritual declarations of commitment to rules-based orders are less an indication of a strong principle than merely a weak sentiment. Moreover, it is so unnecessary and cowardly, and so very dangerous.
Unnecessary because what is on offer in this fiasco is the projection of an American psychosis – in this case concerning a widespread addiction to dangerous drugs – on to Venezuela (among others).
It takes the form of delusions and disorganised thinking and is more a symptom of any number of causal factors in societies, and organisations under severe physical and mental stress and trauma.
Overall the attribution of cause, or causes, for the dire predicament is elsewhere – American exceptionalism assumes America’s essential purity. It is the non-American world that infects.
This is the stuff of fable. Or perhaps Madison Avenue without the sophistication of the Brothers Grimm or Hans Christian Andersen.
And even then the advertising agencies might pass on a contract that would require sanitising the very special relationship that the US has with the interface of politics and the world of drugs.
Given this focus, if the literature (reports, sworn testimony, empirical evidence resulting from robust research) relating to the period since the entry of the US into World War II is consulted, the immediate impression is that one is reading an extended narrative of a government-sanctioned global organised crime syndicate operating continuously for 85 years, and counting.
Strictly speaking, a single focus rapidly reveals fractures requiring their own focus.
Thus – and this list is only indicative – the record reveals close relationships with (officially designated) organised crime and/or war criminals in the US, Central America, and Central, South and South-East Asia.
In the research conducted by Alexander Cockburn and Jeffrey St Clair on the infamousOperation Paperclip – which brought more than 1600 Nazi scientists to the US – the record is of the CIA and other agencies facilitating their transfer from Nazi death camp laboratories to the US, where they worked on chemical and biological agents.
Some of these were reportedly subsequently tested, in breach of all relevant codes of ethics, on black people and patients in mental hospitals.
The reasons for this enmeshment remain the same. It is either a case of supporting drug-running regimes to achieve a strategic advantage or acquiring a superiority in the use of drugs that can alter the behaviour of individuals, large crowds, or whole communities.
They are marked by four defining features.
- First, all are self-destructive criminal enterprises notwithstanding the attempts to legalise some of them;
- second, all eventually qualify as “blowback” – the unintended and unwanted consequences of the covert actions in question;
- third, the operational membrane between them is porous;
- and fourth, there is an inevitability to the confused analysis that attends these outcomes.
Consider the current situation – the US build-up in the Caribbean and off the Pacific coasts of Colombia and Peru.
Venezuela rationale
Nowhere in Trump administration pronouncements is it seen as an unsatisfied demand problem. Rather, the world is expected to believe that the crisis in American drug use is the result of an overwhelming supply, predominantly of opioids such as fentanyl to which Americans succumb in the hundreds of thousands.
Venezuela is named as a principal cause and so must be attacked.
To believe this requires substituting the Trump administration’s preferred reality for the substantial and relevant body of expert knowledge and understanding of drug production and distribution in Central America.
The region – which for current purposes includes Colombia, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Venezuela, and Trinidad and Tobago – is widely described as a “narco free-for-all”.
The fast boats that are being sunk and their crews who are being murdered on the high seas are not, however, even if carrying drugs, headed for the US.
They have sufficient range to reach Trinidad and Tobago. From there, cargos of cocaine and marijuana would be shipped onwards to West Africa, Europe and the US.
Fentanyl, manufactured from precursors imported from China, on the other hand, is smuggled into the US mainly from Mexico and usually by US citizens.
Ulterior motive
Thus, if the source and distribution of opioids are the problem, and not the other forms of drugs, the wrong target is being attacked.
Or there is an ulterior motive for the attacks.
This conclusion is underlined by the fact that, hitherto, the US has not deployed force at current levels in the Caribbean-Pacific area since the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962.
And also by Trump’s decision to pardon the former president of Honduras, Juan Orlando Hernandez, recently convicted after being extradited to the US and sentenced to a 45-years in prison for partnering with cocaine traffickers.
Could the ulterior motive relate in some way to the fact that, beneath the ground there is a vast wealth that dwarfs whatever substance processing and manufacturing takes place above it?
Indeed, a brief inventory of these natural resources is more than sufficient to place Venezuela in the same category as other lust-objects in Trump’s gaze.
Consider in Venezuela the size of known reserves of:
- Oil: 303 billion barrels
- Natural gas: 201 trillion cubic feet
- Gold: 8900 tonnes
- Iron ore: 14,600 million tonnes
- Bauxite: 320 million tonnes
- Nickel: 28.9 million tonnes
To this schedule should be added copper and coltan in amounts yet to be proven and/or certified.
It is here that scepticism must be accompanied by cynicism.
The rational questioning mindset that requires evidence and a logical train of thought before accepting claims needs to be reinforced when it finds that the rationalisation offered – another war on drugs – is but a distraction from the underlying reality which is a blatant display of imperial self-interest pursued by criminal means.
Michael McKinley is a member of the Emeritus Faculty at ANU. He has taught strategy, diplomacy and international conflict at the University of Western Australia and the ANU
The article first appeared in Pearls and Irritations. Read the original here
Want to see more stories from The New Daily in your Google search results?
- Click here to set The New Daily as a preferred source.
- Tick the box next to "The New Daily". That's it.








